From shadow@netcom.com Wed Jun 15 15:45:08 1994
Received: from fnord.tlg.org by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id IAA24253; Wed, 15 Jun 1994 08:44:51 -0700
Received: from netcom.netcom.com by fnord.tlg.org (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id IAA06664; Wed, 15 Jun 1994 08:44:13 -0700
Received: by netcom.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom)
	id IAA06857; Wed, 15 Jun 1994 08:42:30 -0700
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 1994 08:42:30 -0700
Message-Id: <199406151542.IAA06857@netcom.netcom.com>
To: steiner@netcom.com, wjones@igc.apc.org, tburghardt@igc.apc.org,
        virginia@ella.mills.edu, deke@fido.wps.com, kay9bee@aol.com,
        sashar@igc.apc.org, sciww@fido.wps.com, resist@igc.apc.org
Subject: [Forwarded: Tell Congress to Allow Encryption E]
From: shadow@netcom.com (Moonshadow)
Reply-To: shadow@netcom.com
X-Status: 
Status: OR

Hi all ......... I snagged the following off PEACENET and would
like to suggest that each of us send letters/faxes, or make phone
calls, in support of Representative Cantwell's bill.  THIS IS VERY
IMPORTANT!

.........Cynthia

/* Written  3:33 PM  Jun 10, 1994 by gsears in igc:ideas */
/* ---------- "Tell Congress to Allow Encryption E" ---------- */
From: Geoff Sears <gsears>
Subject: Tell Congress to Allow Encryption Export

Hi Everyone!

IGC very rarely takes a position on pending legislation; as a non-profit,
we cannot dedicate a very significant proportion of our budget to lobbying
legislators and attempting to influence legislation ; and, we generally
prefer to serve the environmental, human rights and social justice
communities, and not take positions ourselves. 

However, data encryption and computer networks is a topic that we know 
quite a bit about, and we do have an opinion here.

The following has been prepared by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 
itself a non-profit organization, and we agree fully with it.

- geoff

(Geoff Sears, Executive Director, IGC)


>Date: Fri, 10 Jun 1994 15:26:03 -0400
>From: gnu@eff.org (John Gilmore)
>Subject:  URGENT:  Please Tell Congress to Allow Encryption Export
>Reply-To: ask@eff.org (rather than send us email please fax +1 202 225 1991)
>Precedence: list
>To: eff-activists@eff.org (eff-activists mailing list)
>
>        House Intelligence Committee holds key to Crypto Export
>         ask@eff.org     June 9, 1994      *DISTRIBUTE WIDELY*
>
>Today, the U.S. State Department controls the export of most
>encryption, working closely with the National Security Agency (NSA) to
>limit products that provide real privacy, from cell-phones to PC
>software.  A bill introduced by Rep. Maria Cantwell would instead give
>authority over non-military crypto exports to the Commerce Department.
>Commerce has much more reasonable regulations, with "First
>Amendment"-style unlimited publishing of publicly available software,
>including PGP, Kerberos, RIPEM, RSAREF, and mass-market commercial
>software.  The bill also prevents the Commerce Dept. from tightening
>the regulations even if NSA somehow gets its tentacles into Commerce.
>
>A few months ago, you-all sent over 5600 messages to Rep. Cantwell in
>support of her bill, H.R. 3627.  As a result, on May 18, the bill
>passed the House Foreign Affairs Committee by being incorporated into
>the Export Administration Act of 1994, H.R. 3937.
>
>Now the battle has become more intense.  This portion of H.R. 3937 has
>been referred to the House Intelligence Committee with the intent to
>kill or severely maim it.  We need your help again, to urge the
>Intelligence Committee to keep crypto export liberalization intact.
>
>The House and Senate Intelligence Committees, the only watchdogs for
>the NSA, tend to follow the agency's wishes when they wave the magic
>"national security" wand.  They need plenty of input from the public
>that tells them that the nation will be *more* secure with good
>encryption, even though the NSA will be less happy.
>
>Not just computer users, but all users of telephones, cable TV, health
>care, and credit information systems would benefit from this change.
>The security of these applications is built on the foundation laid by
>the operating systems and network protocols on which they run.  If
>this bill is passed, you will see high quality encryption built into
>Microsoft Windows, into the MacOS, into major Unix workstations, into
>the Internet, into cellular phones, into interactive television.  The
>software already exists for confidentiality, privacy, and security of
>local and networked information, but it's not built-in to these
>systems because of the export ban.  Today, each company could build
>two operating systems, one gutted for international use, but this
>would be costly and confusing for them and their customers, and would
>not allow international networks such as the Internet or telephones to
>be made secure and private.  With this bill, these limits disappear.
>
>Furthermore, the Clinton Administration plans to permit high volume
>exports of Clipper products, while continuing to require tedious
>paperwork for truly secure encryption products.  The bill would give
>Clipper and other crypto software more even-handed treatment.
>
>The bill also eliminates a senseless situation on the Internet.
>Today, crypto software can only be freely distributed from non-U.S.
>archive sites.  It would eliminate that problem as well as the threat
>of prosecution against U.S. freeware authors of crypto software.
>
>This is the dream we've all been working toward.  Here's how you can
>help to make this dream a reality.  The Intelligence Committee must
>make its decision on the bill before June 17, so time is critical:
>
>1) Fax a short letter TODAY to the chair of the Intelligence
>Committee, Representative Dan Glickman (D-KS).  Ask him in your own
>words to leave the encryption provisions of H.R. 3937 intact.  Use a
>positive tone ("Please support...") rather than a flame or a rant.
>One paragraph is fine.  State your title and organization if you will
>look more important or better informed than the average citizen.  Rep.
>Glickman's committee fax number is +1 202 225 1991.  This is the best
>option, since individual letters are given the most weight by members
>of Congress, particularly when sent on letterhead paper.
>
>2) If you are unable to fax a letter, send an e-mail message to Rep.
>Glickman at glickman@eff.org.  Software or staff at the Electronic
>Frontier Foundation will either fax it in, or print it out and
>hand-deliver it for you.
>
>3) Send a copy of this message to everyone you know in Kansas, and
>personally urge them to write to Rep. Glickman today.  Letters from
>constituents get a lot more weight, since they are from people who
>could actually vote for or against him in the next election.
>
>4) If your own Representative is on the Intelligence Committee, send
>him or her a copy of what you sent Rep. Glickman.  There's a list of all
>such Reps. below.  Even if we lose this battle, you will have started
>educating your own Rep. about crypto policy.
>
>5) Become a member of EFF.  Our strength comes from our members' strength.
>Send a note to membership@eff.org asking how to join.
>
>Thanks again for your help!  You can check at any time on the current
>status of the campaign at the location below.  Send any comments on
>this campaign to campaign@eff.org.
>
>
>John Gilmore
>Chairman, EFF Crypto Committee
>EFF Board of Directors
>Member of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility
>Member of International Association for Cryptologic Research
>
>
>House Intelligence Committee Members
>------------------------------------
>
>Subcommittee phone:  +1 202 225 4121
>Subcommittee fax:    +1 202 225 1991    <== send your fax HERE <==
>
>p st name                     phone             fax
>___________________________________________________________________________
>D KS Glickman, Daniel         +1 202 225 6216   private            Chair 
>D WA Dicks, Norman D.         +1 202 225 5916   +1 202 226 1176
>D CA Dixon, Julian C.         +1 202 225 7084   +1 202 225 4091
>D NJ Torricelli, Robert       +1 202 224 5061   +1 202 225 0843
>D TX Coleman, Ronald D.       +1 202 225 4831   +1 202 225 4831
>D CO Skaggs, David E.         +1 202 225 2161   +1 202 225 9127
>D NV Bilbray, James H.        +1 202 225 5965   +1 202 225 8808
>D CA Pelosi, Nancy            +1 202 225 4965   +1 202 225 8259
>D TX Laughlin, Gregory H.     +1 202 225 2831   +1 202 225 1108
>D AL Cramer Jr, Robert (Bud)  +1 202 225 4801   private
>D RI Reed, John F.            +1 202 225 2735   +1 202 225 9580
>D MO Gephardt, Richard A.     +1 202 225 2671   +1 202 225 7452
>R TX Combest, Larry           +1 202 225 4005   +1 202 225 9615
>R NE Bereuter, Douglas        +1 202 225 4806   +1 202 226 1148
>R CA Dornan, Robert K.        +1 202 225 2965   +1 202 225 3694
>R FL Young, C. W. (Bill)      +1 202 225 5961   +1 202 225 9764
>R PA Gekas, George W.         +1 202 225 4315   +1 202 225 8440
>R UT Hansen, James V.         +1 202 225 0453   +1 202 225 5857
>R CA Lewis, Jerry             +1 202 225 5861   +1 202 225 6498
>R IL Michel, Robert H.        +1 202 225 6201   +1 202 225 9461
>
>The full text of this alert is stored at:
>
>  ftp.eff.org, /pub/Alerts/export.alert
>  gopher.eff.org, 1/Alerts, export.alert
>  http://www.eff.org/pub/Alerts/export.alert
>  BBS (+1 202 638 6120, 8N1): "Alerts" file area, export.alt
>
>The actual text of this part of H.R. 3937 is at:
>
>  ftp: ftp.eff.org, /pub/EFF/Policy/Crypto/ITAR_export/hr3937_crypto.excerpt
>  gopher.eff.org, 1/EFF/Policy/Crypto/ITAR_export, hr3937_crypto.excerpt
>  http://www.eff.org/pub/EFF/Policy/Crypto/ITAR_export/hr3937_crypto.excerpt
>  BBS: "Privacy--Crypto" file area, hr3937.crp
>
>For current status on the bill:
>
>  ftp.eff.org, /pub/Alerts/export_alert.update
>  gopher.eff.org, 1/Alerts, export_alert.update
>  http://www.eff.org/pub/Alerts/export_alert.update
>  BBS: "Alerts" file area, export.upd
>
>A general Web page on crypto export policy is at:
>
>  http://www.cygnus.com/~gnu/export.html
>
>
>




