From tomj@wps.com Thu Jul 21 06:44:28 1994
Received: from [140.174.190.102] by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id XAA24311; Wed, 20 Jul 1994 23:41:14 -0700
Message-Id: <199407210641.XAA24311@wps.com>
X-Sender: tomj@fido.wps.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 1994 23:45:33 -0800
To: shit-list@wps.com
From: tomj@wps.com (Tom Jennings)
Subject: gotta learn to type!
X-Status: 
Status: OR

>From: "D. V. Henkel-Wallace" <gumby@cygnus.com>
>Date: Wed, 20 Jul 1994 16:26:08 -0700
>Subject: more fascism on the rampage
>
>Normally I honestly don't worry too much at most "your rights are in
>danger" messages because most of them are just alarmism.  But this is
>_really_ scary.
>
>
>Date: Tue, 19 Jul 1994 12:42:31 -0700
>From: 
>
>Date: Mon, 18 Jul 1994 18:03:24 -0700
>From: email list server <listserv@snyside.sunnyside.com>
>To: cpsr-announce@sunnyside.com
>Subject: Privacy at risk: Educational Records
>
>
>                                             Seattle CPSR Policy Fact Sheet
>                                      K-12 Student Records: Privacy at Risk
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>TOPIC
>
>The U.S. education system is rapidly building a nationwide network of
>electronic student records.  This computer network will make possible the
>exchange of information among various agencies and employers, and the
>continuous tracking of individuals through the social service, education
>and criminal justice systems, into higher education, the military and the
>workplace.
>
>WHAT IS THE ISSUE?
>
>There is no adequate guarantee that the collection and sharing of personal
>information will be done only with the knowledge and consent of students or
>their parents.
>
>Changes Are Coming to Student Records
>National proposals being implemented today include:
>
>-  An electronic "portfolio" to be kept on each student, containing
>   personal essays and other completed work.
>
>-  Asking enrolling kindergartners for their Social Security Numbers,
>   which will be used to track each student's career after high school.
>
>-  Sending High school students' transcripts and "teachers' confidential
>   ratings of a student's work-related behavior," to employers via an
>   electronic network called WORKLINK.
>
>At the heart of these changes is a national electronic student records
>network, coordinated by the federal government and adopted by states with
>federal assistance.
>
>Publication 93-03 of the National Education Goals Panel, a federally
>appointed group recently empowered by the Goals 2000 bill to oversee
>education restructuring nationally, recommends as "essential" that school
>districts and/or states collect expanded information on individual
>students, including:
>-  month and extent of first prenatal care,
>-  birthweight,
>-  name, type, and number of years in a preschool program,
>-  poverty status,
>-  physical, emotional and other development at ages 5 and 6,
>-  date of last routine health and dental care,
>-  extracurricular activities,
>-  type and hours per week of community service,
>-  name of post-secondary institution attended,
>-  post-secondary degree or credential,
>-  employment status,
>-  type of employment and employer name,
>-  whether registered to vote.
>
>It also notes other "data elements useful for research and school
>management purposes":
>-  names of persons living in student household,
>-  relationship of those persons to student,
>-  highest level of education for "primary care-givers,"
>-  total family income,
>-  public assistance status and years of benefits,
>-  number of moves in the last five years,
>-  nature and ownership of dwelling.
>
>Many of these information categories also were included in the public draft
>of the 'Student Data Handbook for Elementary and Secondary Schools',
>developed by the Council of Chief State School Officers to standardize
>student record terminology across the nation.  State and local agencies
>theoretically design their own information systems, but the handbook
>encourages them to collect information for policymakers at all levels. 
>Among the data elements are:
>-  evidence verifying date of birth,
>-  social security number,
>-  attitudinal test,
>-  personality test,
>-  military service experience,
>-  description of employment permit (including permit number,)
>-  type of dwelling,
>-  telephone number of employer.
>
>WHO CAN ACCESS THIS COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION?
>
>Officers, employees and agents of local, state and federal educational
>agencies and private education researchers may be given access to
>individual student records without student or parent consent, according to
>the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (20 USC
>1232g) and related federal regulations (34 CFR 99.3).  Washington state law
>echoes this federal law.
>
>WHAT IS COMING NEXT?
>
>Recent Washington state legislation (SB 6428, HB 1209, HB 2319) directly
>links each public school district with a self-governing group of social
>service and community agencies that will provide services for families.
>
>This type of program is described in detail in the book, Together We Can,
>published jointly by the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S.
>Department of Health and Human Services.  The book speaks of "overcoming
>the confidentiality barrier," and suggests creating centralized data banks
>that gather information about individuals from various government agencies -
>or in other ways ensuring agencies, "ready access to each other's records."
>
>The book calls for a federal role in coordinating policies, regulations and
>data collection.  A group in St. Louis, MO, called Wallbridge Caring
>Communities, is cited as a model for seeking agreements to allow computer
>linkups with schools and the social service and criminal justice systems to
>track school progress, referrals and criminal activity.
>
>WHAT HAPPENED TO ONE COMMUNITY
>
>In Kennewick, WA, over 4,000 kindergarten through fourth graders were rated
>by their teachers on how often they lie, cheat, sneak, steal, exhibit a
>negative attitude, act aggressively, and whether they are rejected by their
>peers.  The scores, with names attached, were sent to a private psychiatric
>center under contract to screen for "at-risk" students who might benefit
>from its programs.  All of this was done without the knowledge and consent
>of the children or their parents. 
>
>CPSR's POSITION
>
>CPSR Seattle believes that schools other agencies should minimize the
>collection, distribution and retention of personal data.  Students and/or
>their parents should decide who has access to detailed personal
>information.
>
>CPSR ACTIONS
>
>Representatives of CPSR Seattle have gone to Olympia to:
>-  oppose the use of the Social Security Number as the standard student
>   identifier,
>
>-  urge legislators to set educational goals that can be measured without
>   invading privacy,
>
>-  oppose turning over individual student records to law enforcement
>   officials apart from a court order or official investigation.
>
>    Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility - Seattle Chapter
>           P.O. Box 85481, Seattle, WA 98145-1481 (206) 365-4528
>                      cpsr-seattle@csli.stanford.edu
>
>
>           --- CPSR ANNOUNCE LIST END ---
>
>

--
World Power Systems -- San Francisco CA 



