From Brian=Callahan%MT%DFCI@RHYS.DFCI.HARVARD.EDU Mon Aug 29 18:51:09 1994
Received: from RHYS.DFCI.HARVARD.EDU by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id LAA18483; Mon, 29 Aug 1994 11:50:01 -0700
Message-Id: <199408291850.LAA18483@wps.com>
Received: by RHYS.DFCI.HARVARD.EDU with VINES ; Mon, 29 Aug 94 14:17:25 EDT
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 13:56:30 EDT
From: Brian=Callahan%MT%DFCI@RHYS.DFCI.HARVARD.EDU
Subject: IWA
To: deke@wps.com
Cc: 
Status: OR

I got and read your letter on the affiliation/alliance with the IWA.  I think 
you have a good idea. The alliance rather than affiliation would circumvent 
the problem of dual representation in the English-speaking countries.  The 
problem with this, it seems to me, is that any negotiations with the IWA have 
to go through the WSA, about which there are still apparently many hard 
feelings.  Do you think this will be discussed at the general meeting?  I 
can't make it, but I'd be interested in hearing about anything that comes up.

BTW, Andrew Flood just mentioned on anarchy-list that a Nigerian group just 
joined the IWA and one of Bangladesh's major unions is interested.  It really 
does seem like a good way to establish international solidarity.

Oh, and I posted the SCIWW article to anarchy-list@cwi.nl and 
alt.society.anarchy on usenet.


In Solidarity, 
Brian


