From sciww Fri Jul 15 21:26:07 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id OAA02993; Fri, 15 Jul 1994 14:26:06 -0700
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407152126.OAA02993@wps.com>
Subject: Next IWW meeting (fwd)
To: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 1994 14:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 782       
Status: OR

Forwarded message:
From sciww Wed Jul 13 03:32:13 1994
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407130331.UAA07278@wps.com>
Subject: Next IWW meeting
To: f4716@deeptht.armory.com
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 1994 20:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: aeon@cruzio.com, newt@armory.com, sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 339       

Hi, Fellow Workers,

The next branch meeting of the IWW will be on Sunday, July 24 at Maile's 
house, which is located at 518 Soquel #2 (upstairs). It is a big pink 
Victorian house behind Mission Printers near Soquel & Ocean, near 
Taqueria Vallarta. Maile can be reached at our branch e-mail account,
sciww@fido.wps.com.

In soli,
Vad.



From vad Fri Jul 22 17:24:05 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id KAA07706; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:24:04 -0700
From: vad (Crys-Vad Hyphus)
Message-Id: <199407221724.KAA07706@wps.com>
Subject: 
To: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2027      
Status: OR

hi deke,

chris the time bomb went off on wednesday; he had robert f. in a choke hold.
that is the underlying reason the meeting was cancelled. kim did it 
unilaterally. i found out from running into kim, bob, robert f. & tim 
shortly after finding the note cancelling the meeting. chris was at the 
big squeeze when i arrived to find the note, and he said "they're 
probably meeting somewhere else; oh yes they're clever..." oh, that we 
could be so together...

FNB got kicked out of israel's; ty "had had enough," so don't blame FW 
israel. the costs of not dealing are coming due, i'm afraid. this on the 
heels of an unfortunate incident that happened while i was away. it 
appears that someone arranged a video night at campbell street & didn't 
check with anyone; the house had plans that night and they got screwed. i 
don't think there's much lingering anger; the free food benefits are too 
significant there. still, there's some damage control to be done.

meanwhile, the priority for the next SCGMB meeting is going to be to get 
more people involved. Right now tai, maile, & myself have been left 
holding the bag for both the assembly & the action. Tai has been focusing on 
assembly & show logistics, and Maile & I are focusing on refocusing the 
community against the camping ban. Maile scheduled a Coalition meeting 
for this saturday, since conveniently the city council will be 
considering amendments to the sitting ban this next tuesday evening.

we're facing a cost overrun of about $125 between the $522 we said we'd 
ask for and what we need, based on tai's revised calculations. i think we 
got it covered in any event, but the harsh reality is that we have to 
succeed in getting more people contributing in every way or the three of 
us holding the bag and you will be killing ourselves putting together 
something surely credible but not nearly as fabulous as we would like.

anyway, we'll be taking you up on your offer to help in every way we can, 
i expect.

i am yours for the revolution,
vad.


From deke Fri Jul 22 17:39:06 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id KAA07822; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:39:06 -0700
From: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Message-Id: <199407221739.KAA07822@wps.com>
Subject: Re: the pony of our discontent
To: vad@fido.wps.com (Crys-Vad Hyphus)
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 1994 10:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <199407221724.KAA07706@wps.com> from "Crys-Vad Hyphus" at Jul 22, 94 10:24:04 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1017      
Status: OR

Yikes, whatta mess! I had no idea it had been that long since the stall 
got shoveled out. Shit's even worse when it's rancid...

I've been illin' the last coupla days, so watch out for cold/flu-like 
symptoms. Lotsa gnarly hack-up-type shit.

Everyone's system's trying to clean out. Sharing is caring, eh? How's 
Sean, BTW? It's been a hard week, even for Jupiter (and he's way huger 
than average...)

I will see y'all soon. Hang in there, comrade.

Also, I got the assembly registration form in the mail yesterday, along 
w/ election results sent out by our fearful leader, GST Rush. Not a word 
from him lately. Now I'm gonna make some GMB-meeting-type calls. ANYway, 
that registration forms is possibly the most radical document I've ever 
seen come outta Our Little Kitty. I got really excited, and tried to call 
each # on it (well, you  three's at least)-- only reached Tai. It made me 
feel *really* good, an unlikely event yesterday afternoon...

In Solidarity, I remain
Yours for the Revolution,
--Deke


From sciww Fri Jul 22 22:15:36 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id PAA09769; Fri, 22 Jul 1994 15:15:35 -0700
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407222215.PAA09769@wps.com>
Subject: Re:  test message (fwd)
To: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 1994 15:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 434       
Status: OR

Forwarded message:

From sciww Tue Jul 26 21:35:46 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id OAA07352; Tue, 26 Jul 1994 14:35:33 -0700
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407262135.OAA07352@wps.com>
Subject: elm files
To: aeon@cruzio.com
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 1994 14:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: f4713@deeptht.armory.com, newt@armory.com, sciww (Santa Cruz IWW),
        deke (Deke Motif Nihilson), vad (Crys-Vad Hyphus)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2407      
Status: OR

hi josh, and interested fellow workers, vad here...

incoming mailto the scgmb's account, sciww@fido.wps.com, is currently 
being filed in 9 files within the "Mail" directory in our home directory. 

incoming messages can be saved in these files with elm by using the s)ave 
command from the menu. at the "save to folder:" prompt, type the name of 
the file preceeded by an "=" sign. use the "?" to get help from elm at 
this point, or "man elm" from the shell prompt for more info.

the current files are:

1-union: anything received from the 1-union mailing list.

bacorr: anything received from the Bay Area Coalition for Our 
        Reproductive Rights, as well as any clinic-defense related e-mail.

cdp: anything received on laws & struggles related to the criminalization 
     of the poor, Coalition to Decriminalize Poverty, etc. Some food not
     bombs material that deals with greater issues, like the keith   
     mc henry trials can be included here, though food not bombs has its  
     own file as well.

cwsc: anything related to Class War-Santa Cruz and Love & Rage.

fnb: Food Not Bombs. anything received for food not bombs, including all 
     dialogue between food not bombs members.

iww: internal discussion & mail received from Wobblies.

iww.news: anything recieved via the IWW newsgroup, as well as any replies 
          & related discussion to anything received.

received: any mail that has been read will be saved here if one leaves 
          elm with the q)uit rather than the e(x)it command and one 
          answeres (y)es to the question "move read mail to received 
          folder." it is a holding place for recent mail before filing 
          (which needs to be cleaned out as of this writing).

songs: lyrics to political songs.

these categories are not exhaustive, & more may need to be created. they 
can be accessed by elm with the (c)hange folder command. for example, to 
look at the fnb file, type "c" and then type "=fnb" at the prompt. 
incoming mail should probably be left around for a few days in either the 
incoming or received files before deletion, and probably shouldn't be 
filed until they've moved into the received folder, so things don't get 
filed twice. creating a personal file for each user may be useful too. 
anyway, we should keep in touch while we try to get a workable procedure 
so things don't get too chaotic.

in soli, vad.



From sciww@ucscb.UCSC.EDU Mon Aug  1 05:25:01 1994
Received: from toad.com by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id WAA00463; Sun, 31 Jul 1994 22:24:59 -0700
Received: from ucscb.UCSC.EDU by toad.com id AA05578; Sun, 31 Jul 94 22:15:38 PDT
Received: by ucscb.UCSC.EDU (5.65/1.34)
	id AA16032; Sun, 31 Jul 94 22:12:23 -0700
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 94 22:12:23 -0700
From: sciww@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <9408010512.AA16032@ucscb.UCSC.EDU>
To: deke@fido.wps.com
Subject: getting onto wps.com
Cc: sciww@fido.wps.com
Status: OR


hi deke, vad here; it's sunday night, at 9:53 and each of my attempts to
telnet to wps.com has resulted in a "Connection timed out" message, so i
haven't got any of my most recent mail. i just thought someone in the
office there should know that this is happening.

anyway, not to complain... i'm going to try get something off about bacorr
from some of the e-mail. i'll send it off to tom burghardt for input when
it's done. i can't start on it now cuz i can't get on to my account where
it's all saved.

yours for the revolution,
vad.

From sciww Fri Jul 15 21:27:28 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id OAA03013; Fri, 15 Jul 1994 14:27:27 -0700
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407152127.OAA03013@wps.com>
Subject: food not kkkops! (fwd)
To: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 1994 14:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2588      
Status: OR

Forwarded message:
From deke Wed Jul 13 18:08:25 1994
From: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Message-Id: <199407131808.LAA12259@wps.com>
Subject: food not kkkops! (fwd)
To: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW), vad (Crys-Vad Hyphus)
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 1994 11:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2176      

Forwarded message:
From 73174.77@compuserve.com Wed Jul 13 17:58:11 1994
Date: 13 Jul 94 13:53:00 EDT
From: Fred  Chase <73174.77@compuserve.com>
To: Deke <Deke@fido.wps.com>
Subject: food not kkkops!
Message-ID: <940713175300_73174.77_DHI123-1@CompuServe.COM>


-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject: +Postage Due+food not kkkops!
Date:    13-Jul-94 at 12:00   
From:    THE ANARCHO-CYNICALIST SPLEEN SQUEEGIE, INTERNET:JHEATHCO@ucs.indiana.edu

To:  Fred  Chase,73174,77

Sender: cspplist@weber.ucsd.edu
Received: from weber.ucsd.edu by arl-img-2.compuserve.com (8.6.4/5.940406sam)
	id LAA23650; Wed, 13 Jul 1994 11:57:41 -0400
Received: from weber.ucsd.edu (buserver@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by weber.ucsd.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA14969; Wed, 13 Jul
1994 08:41:18 -0700
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 1994 08:41:18 -0700
Message-Id: <199407131541.IAA14956@weber.ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: triley@weber.ucsd.edu
Reply-To: cspplist@weber.ucsd.edu
Originator: cspplist@weber.ucsd.edu
Sender: cspplist@weber.ucsd.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: THE ANARCHO-CYNICALIST SPLEEN SQUEEGIE <JHEATHCO@ucs.indiana.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <cspplist@weber.ucsd.edu>
Subject: food not kkkops!
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0b -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas

yes do keep fwding the Food Not Bombs information here.  i get a lot of it on
the aaa-web, but i think it is probably useful to this list as well.

also, if the SF people would post some more general articles about Matrix and
the overall criminalization of homelessness being spearheaded by that nazi
dipshit mayor of yours, i think that would provide some good material for
discussin and action!

joseph average

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@ ...go now ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall   @
@ come upon you.  Your riches are corrupted...your gold and silver is @
@ cankered, and the rust of them shall be a witness against you...    @
@                              		 --James 5:1-6                @
@ BLOOMINGTON ANARCHIST UNION   PO BOX 3207  BLOOMINGTON, IN  47402   @
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@




-- 


From sciww Wed Jul 27 10:20:59 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id DAA12164; Wed, 27 Jul 1994 03:20:59 -0700
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407271020.DAA12164@wps.com>
Subject: power supply, reasons, etc.
To: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 03:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1462      
Status: OR

hi deke, vad here;

got a draft of my letter to the union off to you. maybe GST rush will get 
a glimpse of the fact that maybe i am an independent thinker after all 
when he sees this. or maybe that i'm just good at writing what *you* have 
to say...

the power stuff got my creative juices going...i'm much happier with my 
conclusion now, especially since i get to be an *anarchist* for once; 
i've been wanting that to show a little more lately...oh but what a 
bizarre opportunity...

i wanted to remind you about the power supply. justin said it might take 
a slightly larger power supply than before to run a 386. i guess tom 
would probably know what's needed. i'll look into that money.

maile could use any fiscal help this month you may be able to muster. of 
course i do too, but i think she should get anything you've got to share 
before me, as you've already helped me. i hope to have a job soon and 
help her out as well as myself. i've already been feeding her with my 
food stamps, which are nearly gone 2 weeks before i get my next batch. i 
guess those calculations are about right! (thank goddess for food not 
bombs! it's not just for the homeless anymore...) i got a lead at a mental 
health center, and i intend to be just too relentlessly bothersome to 
these temp  agencies for them to keep not providing employment services, 
cause kitty is so very neeeedy...

anyway, i'm yours for the revolution,
both internally & externally,
vad.


From sciww Thu Jul 28 07:58:01 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id AAA21321; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 00:58:00 -0700
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407280758.AAA21321@wps.com>
Subject: anti-poor laws & class struggle
To: deke@fido.wps.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 00:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: vad@fido.wps.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 8373      
Status: OR

Okay, here is the revised version. Feedback would be appreciated and or 
if you like it the way it is please distribute.
-maile

Santa Cruz Camping Ban/ Conduct Ordinances; 
The Criminalization 
of Dissent

	We of the Santa Cruz I.W.W. hold that recent attacks on 
poor, homeless and activist street communities are not merely the 
result of a local aberration. These attacks are part of a national
effort to manage the radicalization and social protest of an 
increasing number of people experiencing poverty.  

A Brief Introduction 
	Gentrification, meaning redevelopment, increasing rent, 
and costly 'beautification,' (efforts aimed at attracting a more 
upper-class tourist base) provides the backdrop and justification 
for intensified social control. With the creation of several new 
categories of petty crime, such as sitting, asking for spare 
change or sleeping in public, a  powerful City-Business-Developer 
alliance is emerging to ensconce police harassment in the 
necessary judicial legitimation. Explicit use of selective 
enforcement, condoned police brutality, the absence of jury trials
and the imposition of costly fines for convicted offenders are all
elements of the recently re-worked public "conduct ordinances." 

Criminalization of the "Lifestyle Choice;"
Managing Social Dissent
	While proponents argue that the new legislation targets 
behavior and not specific classes or communities of people, we of 
the I.W.W. maintain that the targeted "behaviors" are those which 
characterize  certain social classes. Sitting on the sidewalk, 
peacefully asking for spare change, or sleeping in  public are all
aspects of a social condition.  Yet city power players and the 
capitalist press have been very successful in their unrelenting 
portrayal of homelessness and poverty as an individual "lifestyle 
choice." In Santa Cruz this assertion functions as the linchpin of
moral justification for ever-increasing criminalization of 
homelessness. We charge that it is extremely  false to assert that
any majority of the nation's homeless are "homeless by choice." 
Yet the disgust, and hatred that is exhibited towards those 
perceived  as choosing not to participate in the current economic 
system seems telling. Why should the assertion that a particular 
"lifestyle" was chosen   be valid grounds for its subsequent 
suppression? Perhaps because that "choice" is perceived as a 
tremendous threat to the current status quo in Santa Cruz, a 
status quo predicated upon cheap, available, very low paid labor 
bound to the second highest rents in the nation. What would happen
if the option to avoid rent and wage slavery by sleeping outdoors 
were to become more desirable and/or possible for a large number 
of people? The bosses and landlords in town however "progressive" 
they may claim to be would then have to face the level to which 
their privileges and comfort depend on the subordination of 
others. Thus we assert that criminalizing a certain social 
condition because it is perceived as a choice, demonstrates the 
purposeful effort to manufacture consent and enforce bondage to 
the highly exploitative work/rent system. The criminalization of  
the "choice" not to participate in "the system,"  demonstrates the
facist strategy of current anti-homeless campaigns; to attack, 
manage, regulate and ultimately destroy perceived or actual social
dissent.

Anti-poor Campaigns and Class Struggle	
	The Camping Ban, the "conduct" ordinances and the 
surrounding neo-liberal discourse about "behavior" and 
'right-to-be rich' are targeted not only at street populations but
also those who are currently housed and employed. All low paid 
waged laborers; copy/coffee/food service workers, retail laborers,
office workers, temporaries, light industry productionists etc. 
are essentially being warned by anti-homeless legislation to "play
it safe" on the job so as not to end up on the street. The effort 
to stigmatize and outright vilify an economic circumstance that 
all waged workers must constantly struggle to avoid is a very 
useful strategy for keeping labor in line. In Santa Cruz a 
worker's existence is primarily defined by  the constant struggle 
to maintain legal housing where over half of one's monthly wages 
may go towards rent. The criminalization of the condition of being
unable to pay rent functions as a very real demand that workers 
remain ever-grateful for current employment, regardless of working
conditions  or pay. By securing access to a subdued and fearful 
service-industry work force supporters of anti-homeless 
legislation (almost entirely bosses) seek to simultaneously sweep 
the streets  of the homeless while assuring that there will always
be a willing employee to hold the broom.
	To fully accomplish this indirect threat to the working 
class the current pro-ordinance campaign must completely segregate
those who might have common interests, such as waged workers and 
the unemployed, as well as different communities of homeless 
people. To criminalize the disenfranchised without garnering 
sympathy or outrage from simularly situated groups, pro-ordinance 
discourse has cast the homeless into two  predictable categories; 
"hapless (passive) victims" and the 'life stylists,' the 
agressive, ugly, dirty and thoroughly unworthy. The "good" 
homeless go to the (very few) shelter spaces while the "bad" 
lifestylists "choose" to put their poverty in the public eye. In 
this way it becomes obnoxious and indeed "aggressive" merely to 
exist as poor, dirty ugly etc. in public. These undeserving 
"aggressive" poor are then found to be quite at odds with  the 
sought after "nice-ness" of an upper-class pacific  garden mall,  
replete with wide "unmarred" sidewalks, costly decorations, and 
smiling ever-replaceable service. Homelessness is then 
successfully re-defined as a "public nuisance" and even a danger 
to "public safety." This re-definition makes explicit the class 
assumptions at play in the current use of the word "public."  It 
also clarifies the position that any good employee who serves "the
(upper-class) public" should occupy.  Divisions like these operate
as an ideological stimatization and indeed a material threat 
against any alliance or organization between those who are 
currently on the streets and those who are one paycheck away. 
	For this reason the I.W.W intends to organize right over  
the ruling class division of "producer"  vs. "derelict." In the 
IWW we understand that the employed and unemployed are both a part
of the same labor pool subject to the tides of the capitalist 
economy  and other webs of exploitation regardless of whether we 
currently have a job. Solidarity between employed and unemployed 
workers means the difference between an employed class with teeth,
and an expendable work force easily replaced by unorganized labor.
This sort of solidarity can also mean the difference between 
ends on, as well as those it is willing to 
discard.

The SC Camping Ban 
	Thus our goal in the upcoming months is the abolishment of
the SC Camping Ban.  Like the conduct ordinances the SC Camping 
Ban criminalizes homelessnes by making illegal that which largely 
defines it; sleeping without a shelter. This law, while older and 
less present in the media than the newly passed six "conduct" 
ordBan. Yet rather than be
admonished through freedoms of speech protected under the 
constitution, the City Council, with the forceful backing of the 
Downtown Business Association and the Santa Cruz Police Department
decided to pre-empt the ability  to protest this particular law by
criminalizing the various elements of such protest. This was 
accomplished with the outlawing of  signs on the sidewalk after dark and 
the re-definition of shelter materials, backpacks or sleeping bags as 
obstructions or "public nuisance."
	While we do not intend to ignore the current "conduct" ordinances 
the I.W.W. would like to advocate a shift in focus and a renewal of 
activism aimed at the Camping Ban in particular as well as the entirety 
of gentrification/ social regulation underway in Santa Cruz. So lets get 
organized! Lets beat the bosses with a solidarity the likes of which 
they've never seen!

A message from the Santa Cruz General Membership branch of the I.W.W.
Compiled by FW Maile
S.C.G.M.B
POB 534
Santa Cruz, CA 95061
sciww@fido.wps.com


From deke Thu Jul 28 17:44:46 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id KAA25042; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 10:44:46 -0700
From: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Message-Id: <199407281744.KAA25042@wps.com>
Subject: Re: anti-poor laws & class struggle
To: sciww@fido.wps.com (Santa Cruz IWW)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 10:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson), vad (Crys-Vad Hyphus)
In-Reply-To: <199407280758.AAA21321@wps.com> from "Santa Cruz IWW" at Jul 28, 94 00:57:59 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2495      
Status: OR

> 
> Okay, here is the revised version. Feedback would be appreciated and or 
> if you like it the way it is please distribute.
> -maile

It's a bit longer, which I've (as a wordy person myself) often been 
advised against, but I still find it unspeakably hot. Yesss, *really*!

There's a couple places towards the end, though, where it's garbled. If 
you fix it and send me it again, I'll gladly work it far and wide!

Solidarity!
--Deke

Special P.S.: Oh, by the way, I've looked for Solidarity While Supplies 
Last, and don't seem to have it; I may have left it in S.C. Look for a 
folder marked "G.I.B." (that's Grand Industrial Band). It may well be in 
there. If you find it, please do send me a copy, and if not, lemme know 
and I'll look again; I know I didn't pitch it...



> 
> Santa Cruz Camping Ban/ Conduct Ordinances; 
> The Criminalization 
> of Dissent
> 
> 	For this reason the I.W.W intends to organize right over  
> the ruling class division of "producer"  vs. "derelict." In the 
> IWW we understand that the employed and unemployed are both a part
> of the same labor pool subject to the tides of the capitalist 
> economy  and other webs of exploitation regardless of whether we 
> currently have a job. Solidarity between employed and unemployed 
> workers means the difference between an employed class with teeth,
> and an expendable work force easily replaced by unorganized labor.
> This sort of solidarity can also mean the difference between 
> ends on, as well as those it is willing to 
> discard.

Last sentence. Also, first paragraph of:

> 
> The SC Camping Ban 
> 	Thus our goal in the upcoming months is the abolishment of
> the SC Camping Ban.  Like the conduct ordinances the SC Camping 
> Ban criminalizes homelessnes by making illegal that which largely 
> defines it; sleeping without a shelter. This law, while older and 
> less present in the media than the newly passed six "conduct" 
> ordBan. Yet rather than be
> admonished through freedoms of speech protected under the 
> constitution, the City Council, with the forceful backing of the 
> Downtown Business Association and the Santa Cruz Police Department
> decided to pre-empt the ability  to protest this particular law by
> criminalizing the various elements of such protest. This was 
> accomplished with the outlawing of  signs on the sidewalk after dark and 
> the re-definition of shelter materials, backpacks or sleeping bags as 
> obstructions or "public nuisance."


Love Ya!
--Deke

From sciww Fri Jul 29 00:17:30 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id RAA27551; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 17:17:29 -0700
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407290017.RAA27551@wps.com>
Subject: OR (fwd)
To: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 17:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1199      
Status: OR

Forwarded message:
From mattm@nyxfer.blythe.org Thu Jul 28 16:44:14 1994
From: Matt Rothwell <mattm@nyxfer.blythe.org>
Message-Id: <9407281647.AA12558@nyxfer.blythe.org>
Subject: OR
To: sciww@fido.wps.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 11:47:03 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 795       

Hi Comrades!
Well, the new issue of Love and Rage is about to go to press next
week if we can come up with some dough.  We were going to print
something about the 'upcoming' campaign Operation Rescue was going
to have in California for a month, but seeing as how that campaign is
now over, I'd like to replace what we had with a short (~150-200 word)
blurb describing what happened, how they fizzled again, etc.  I really
need this in the next couple days and would be enormously grateful if
one of you all could provide this.

In other news, I'm happy to say that I'll be out there for the Assembly.
That was an overwhleming vote!  Great work.  The promotional sheet sent
out with the election results was a coup d'grace.  I'm looking forward
to seeing you all.

Yours for Revolution,
Matt M.



From sciww Fri Jul 29 02:38:00 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id TAA28783; Thu, 28 Jul 1994 19:37:59 -0700
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407290237.TAA28783@wps.com>
Subject: anti-poor lws/class struggle-last paragraph
To: deke@fido.wps.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 1994 19:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: vad@fido.wps.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 2067      
Status: OR

Sorry about the garbling-this has happened with a number of long things I 
have tried to send out. Hope it works this time. I'm going to be making 
brochures of this in nice graphically pleasing column form - hopefully 
that will help with the wordiness...

so here is the last paragraph again:


The SC Camping Ban 
	Thus our goal in the upcoming months is the abolishment of
the SC Camping Ban.  Like the conduct ordinances the SC Camping 
Ban criminalizes homelessnes by making illegal that which largely 
defines it; sleeping without a shelter. This law, while older and 
less present in the media than the newly passed six "conduct" 
ordinances ,  was the very law under contestation (via public 
sleeping Peace Vigil demonstrations ) when the new ordinances 
began to be seriously considered. The new "conduct" laws are in 
large part a reaction to legal protest and freedom of speech 
against the older more established Camping Ban. Yet rather than be
admonished through freedoms of speech protected under the 
constitution, the City Council, with the forceful backing of the 
Downtown Business Association and the Santa Cruz Police Department
decided to pre-empt the ability  to protest this particular law by
criminalizing the various elements of such protest. This was 
accomplished with the outlawing of  signs on the sidewalk after 
dark and the re-definition of shelter materials , backpacks or 
sleeping bags as obstructions, or "public nuisance." 
	While we do not intend to ignore the current "conduct" 
ordinances the IWW would like to advocate a shift in focus and a 
renewal of activism aimed at the Camping Ban in particular as well
as the entirety of gentrification/ social regulation underway in 
Santa Cruz.  So lets get organized! Lets beat the bosses with a 
solidarity the likes of which they've never seen!

A message from your local General Membership Branch of the 
Industrial Workers of the World. 
Compiled by FW Maile 

S.C.G.M.B 
POB 534
Santa Cruz, CA 95061
sciww@fido.wps.com

Well, okay the last series of paragraphs!
love ,
maile

From sciww Tue Jul 12 20:30:13 1994
Received: from localhost by fido.wps.com (8.6.5/wps.com-hackery)
	id NAA04663; Tue, 12 Jul 1994 13:30:12 -0700
From: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW)
Message-Id: <199407122030.NAA04663@wps.com>
Subject: The only S.F. FNB coverage... (fwd)
To: deke@fido.wps.com
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 1994 13:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1427      
X-Status: 
Status: OR

Forwarded message:

From deke Tue Jul 12 18:52:32 1994
From: deke (Deke Motif Nihilson)
Message-Id: <199407121852.LAA04109@wps.com>
Subject: The only S.F. FNB coverage...
To: vad (Crys-Vad Hyphus)
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 1994 11:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sciww (Santa Cruz IWW), rpaulson@ucscb.ucsc.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 980       
X-Status: 
Status: OR

...I've been able to find in the daily crapitalist press in this here 
town, is a sweet li'l snippet from a gawddamn Herb Caen column, appended. 
For yer edification, allow me to present you therewith:

*****begin excerpt*****

MORE COPSTUFF: Officer Siobhan McAuliffe, whose hard-boiled tactics 
during the "Food Not Bombs" demonstrations won her the nickname of "Jane 
Wayne," has a softer side. While she was patrolling Civic Center, she met 
the mayor's bodyguard, Officer Mike Hughes, and they are definitely an 
item. In fact, they spent last weekend at the Hetch Hetchy "chateau" in 
Yosemite, reserved for the well-connected who feed at the public trough...

*****end excerpt*****

Maybe they make love in the blood of miscreant performance artists.

Do *you* feel kinda warm and fuzzy yet, like someone slipped meds in yer 
gruel? 

As usual, I dunno what's been on the teevees, but apparently the above is 
the Chronic's idea of coverage...


I'd Laugh, *But*,
--Deke
 


